SRO's Not Part of Mayor's 2013-2014 Budget

Mayor Blake's 2013-2014 City budget includes no staff additions, but the City will be looking for federal dollars to possibly fund School Resource Officers in Milford schools.

One item that will not be in Mayor Blake's 2013-2014 City budget is School Resource Officers, specially trained police officers who carry guns and become part of the school's environment.

Superintendent Dr. Elizabeth Feser was looking to add one SRO at each high school, Jonathan Law and Foran, as well as two or three additional officers throughout the middle schools.

In a visit at Foran High School last week, Senator Chris Murphy addressed SRO issue, specifically asking about the possibility of a Police presence "criminalizing behavior" in Milford Schools.

Mayor Blake's budget calls for no staff increases and he said that the City of Milford will see if they can fund SRO's through Federal funds, though that issue will not be brought up in Congress until March 2013 at the earliest.

Mayor Blake pointed to the huge training process that SRO's go through and said that there is "no guarantee" that Milford will receive Federal funds for SRO's.

He noted that there would be between one to five School Resource Officers in Milford Public Schools, but not more than five.

What Are SRO's?

"SRO's are more than police in schools," said Milford Police Chief Keith Mello. "It's about building relationships and partnerships with school staff and students," while the officers would be "capable of addressing any threat to our schools."

Chief Mello added that SRO's can serve as mentors and advisors to students.
The Milford Police have applied for federal funds for SRO's on two separate occasions. Chief Mello believes that the programs "add a lot of value" to schools.

Your Take on the Issue

There has been a great deal of debate in the comments section of Milford Patch on the issue of SRO's.

Milford Patch user John wrote: "There are so many more things we can do before we resort to putting guns in our schools." and CuriousOrange noted, "Having an armed officer at Columbine did not deter the carnage."

Milford_Parent responded: "You think it's ok to put armed guards on a Brinks truck and at banks, but you all feel that is not appropriate for our precious children. Get a grip folks, its not Mayberry anymore."

Robert Jochim February 04, 2013 at 09:24 PM
SROs are a good, but temporary solution at best. We must address the causes of school violence - especially the over-medication of our children with psychoactive chemicals, sometimes on the opinion of teachers! Add to that the culture we live in that glorifies violence, and total disregard for life itself. Until we stop abdicating our responsibilities of parenting, this situation will only get worse. We don't have a gun problem - we have a morality problem. Guns are being used as a scapegoat, and our dead children are being used to push through political agendas. Parents - it's time to look in the mirror to see the cause of the problem.
RONALD M GOLDWYN February 05, 2013 at 03:05 AM
One child's funeral had an open casket so that all could see what 10+ bullets to the head looks like. They made their point as one picture was equal to the whole eulogy.What will it take to make you ban these guns and ammo clips? A member of your family next? The killer's mother found out the hard way that she should have had her guns in a gun safe with a combo lock with access known but to herself.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »